🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an event that was initiated as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a commercial tone, growing to encompass functions where African descendants are remunerated to speak with white audiences about hidden biases and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The tide has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in February, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since that time, placing less emphasis on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the celebration is commemorated is a indication of the political moment. How it develops is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the recent season we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a elected representative gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in Europe as a whole.

In the United States, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A campaign to scrub Black history and experience from the records is under way. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the observance illustrates how little it can be influential if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered festivities of historical achievements, rather than addressing the realities of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is required. Denise Miller, a prof at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a urge to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month completely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an time that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an infrastructure that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a time that does not shy away from politics, and leaves space for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What use is basic knowledge of the past when it ignores the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Institutions who observe it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to subtle slights, but confronted with the dangers that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and reactive. It could be that an complete renaming is required – Black History is Now Month.